![]() Test for vulns locally on a developer machine, in a CICD pipeline, or anywhere else your team can dream of. The scanner can run consistently and reliably in any computing environment that your team needs. What makes this all possible is that StackHawk is deployed via a Docker container. Kicking off your first scan does not require learning a complex UI, deploying servers, or changing firewall rules. StackHawk was built to run anywhere, so anyone can get going with automated security testing. Users can schedule the scan to happen at a certain time, indicate if they would like it to be recurring, and pull in a Burp generated scan profile that has pre-determined parameters around crawl time limits, crawl speed, and audit coverage. Scan creation is built to be very security-friendly. The admin will create target sites for scanning in the Burp UI.įrom there the user will configure a scan profile for the site. Luckily, configuring scans once the infrastructure is deployed is straightforward, especially if the admin has used Burp Pro previously. The web server and enterprise server require separate configuration before users can begin customizing the scanning agents. To get going with the on premises offering, teams must provision VMs for a web server, an enterprise server, a database, and Burp scanning agents. So much for getting this rolled out to the team before Friday.īurp Suite and StackHawk have big differences when it comes to deployment. You’re pumped to roll out that sexy new tool across your team.Īnd then you look at the config guide and your jaw drops because there are 11ty billion steps to get this thing going. Key Differences Between Burp Suite and StackHawk Scanner Configuration In this blog, we will dive into each of these so you can get a better picture of what tool is right for your team. ![]() The differences between these two tools are most clear across four areas: configuration, automated scanning in CICD, coverage for APIs, and dev-friendly features. Which tool is right for you depends on your requirements and how you are looking to scale application and API security testing across your team.įor teams familiar with Burp Suite that are looking to have a CICD system kick-off a build, but largely keep security in control of testing, review, and remediation, Burp Suite is a solid tool - especially if the team is already familiar with Burp’s other offerings.įor teams that are looking to shift application security left, gaining the efficiencies promised by DevOps and CICD automation, StackHawk is the ticket. Burp Suite utilizes a proprietary scanner and StackHawk is built on top of ZAP – the world’s most popular security testing tool. The comparison tl drīurp Suite and StackHawk both have best in class scanning capabilities. The scanner runs in CICD with features developers love, and provides coverage for modern apps and APIs. Its sweet spot is for teams looking to scale API and application security across development teams. StackHawk is an alternative to Burp Suite. And while the product has the same high quality application security scanner, it doesn’t check all the boxes for modern teams looking to integrate security testing into product delivery. Building on the popularity of Burp for individual use, Portswigger (the company that created Burp Suite) introduced the enterprise version of its AppSec testing tool to capture a different market – those looking to automate security testing across their org.īurp Enterprise came with big promises. For those who are newer to the space, Burp Suite is one of the leading application security testing tools used by penetration testers and security analysts. If you have any background in application security, you are familiar with Burp Suite. ![]() Burp Suite is loved by security users and pen testers for its proxy feature that allows the manual manipulation of traffic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |